CMAC is proudly Sponsored by:

Banner
CMAC Responds to the Western SoMa Draft EIR
Thursday, 09 August 2012 11:36

Recently, an Environmental Impact Review (EIR) was done to analyze the impact of redevelopment on the Western SoMa neighborhood of San Francisco.

Upon review, CMAC determined that this Draft EIR doesn't adequately address the impacts of the plan on existing nightlife businesses. Certain development aspects would have real, lasting, destructive impacts on SoMa cultural spaces, including venues that support the LGBT Community, multiple ethnic communities, and spaces that provide support to non-profits and serve as community resources to all of San Francisco.

As a response, CMAC submitted a formal public comment to the Planning Commission on August 6 outlining our concerns.
Read our comment below or
download a PDF of our comment here.


Dear Members of the San Francisco Planning Commission:

The California Music and Culture Association (CMAC) urges you to amend the Draft EIR to correct inaccurate statements we have identified.  We also respectfully highlight the absence of impact analysis on nightlife cultural spaces and outdoor events in the report.

The underlying plan would implement a new regulatory framework greatly expanding housing and for-profit development while ignoring longstanding historic and cultural resources, namely nightlife venues and outdoor events. This change would have real, lasting, and negative impacts on cultural spaces, including venues and events that support the LGBT Community and multiple ethnic communities, provide support to non-profits, and serve as community resources to all of San Francisco.

DEIR Factual Errors:

The DEIR fails to accurately represent the area the plan intends to represent. Specifically the DEIR refers to a map of the area (page 4.F-10; Figure 4.F-4) that is purported to include all of the area’s “Arts and Entertainment Establishments.”  We have found by referencing the City Tax Collector records there are some 19 errors within the plan area and three on the boundaries, clearly within the area of impact.

Appendix A lists the summary of the errors highlighted by type of error and Appendix B shows the update of the Figure 4.F-10 map drawn with corrected information put in place.

DEIR Falls Short of Analyzing Impacts of Plan on Nightlife:

The DEIR fails to capture the impact the plan will have on cultural / historic nightlife spaces. The DEIR barely recognizes any impact, with a rare example in section 4D-24, where the DEIR suggests that historic and cultural resources impacted by the new plan could be respected by honoring these spaces with a plaque. With all due respect, destroying nightlife spaces to pave the way for new condominiums while leaving a plaque naming the destroyed cultural resource is no way to honor and maintain cultural assets in San Francisco.

The DEIR makes no mention of the impacts (transportation, public safety, and congestion) that will be created by the location of future entertainment venues to the “SALI” area bounded by Harrison and Bluxome Streets and between Fourth and 13th Streets.  This is an area with no entertainment and is far from the Market Street transportation corridor, including, most importantly, BART.

This DEIR does not recognize the extraordinary challenges posed by placing housing in nightlife areas without those proposed residences having a buffer zone.  Considering the substantial effort placed in creating buffer zones around identified housing enclaves, it seems an error to fail to note the impacts that will be felt by housing when it is placed in nightlife centric historic commercial areas.  Specifically we know that the proximity of housing to facilities like entertainment, bars and restaurants is an important consideration to the peaceful and quiet enjoyment of those residents.  We know that previous attempts to notify new residents through deed restrictions have had no legal standing and provide no protection for existing entertainment, bar and restaurant uses and ultimately favor the new residential use.  Eleventh Street between Harrison and Howard is home to 7 entertainment and 4 eating establishments, and the DEIR contains no mention of this historically documentable impact.

Chapter 90-A of the San Francisco Administrative Code adopted in 2008 established San Francisco’s Music and Culture Sustainability Policy to support nightlife and entertainment venues as “a vital component of the quality of life for all the diverse communities of San Francisco.” The policy adopted by the City states that it is a priority for the City to foster, promote and sustain music and culture assets like nightclubs.

DEIR Falls Short of Analyzing Impacts Plan on Outdoor Fairs and Events:

Finally, the DEIR fails to capture any of the street fairs or exterior cultural and music events in the plan area that are impacted by the plan and whose impacts can be empirically measured.   The DEIR barely mentions the existence of these significant cultural institutions, which is troubling when you consider one of those events is the third largest street event in California.

Page 2-17 mentions the Folsom Street Fair in the context of cultural events that are to be recognized and protected yet the mitigations suggested include “tax incentives, FAR exemptions, urban design and building height exemptions” which have nothing to do with an outdoor cultural event. The methodology that is being prescribed for mitigations is inaccurate and does not address the impacts that will be felt by these historic and cultural events.

Again the map found on page 4.F-10 attempts to locate these events within the district but fails to recognize the huge impact that other elements of this plan will have on said

events.  We have already seen events forced to relocate (How Weird Street Faire) and change their configuration in an effort to ameliorate the impacts that have already been experienced in the plan area.  No mention is made about the amplification of impacts that the plan will have on these renowned cultural institutions.

We appreciate the opportunity to make these formal observations and urge the Commission to consider appropriate amendments.

Sincerely,

Laura Hahn
Executive Director








 
Photos from the 2012 Nightlife Awards!
Wednesday, 06 June 2012 12:11

Created with Admarket's flickrSLiDR.
 
2012 Nightlife Award Winners!
Friday, 01 June 2012 09:07

PRESS RELEASE
June 1, 2012

SF Nightlife Community Celebrates “Empowering the Other 9 to 5” With Awards
Premier entertainment trade association honors CMAC Award Winners and celebrates accomplishments

San Francisco, CA (June 1, 2012) - The California Music and Culture Association (CMAC) celebrated its two year anniversary and recognized industry members who demonstrate excellence in nightlife entertainment at the CMAC Nightlife Awards on Thursday, May 31 at Mezzanine.

Masters of Ceremony Anna Conda and Marke Bieschke, Nightlife Columnist and Senior Editor at SF Bay Guardian presented the awards to this year's winners:

Best Festival: Treasure Island Music Festival

Best Live Venue: Cafe Du Nord

Best Large Club: Public Works

Best Small Club: Monarch

Best Bar: Blackbird

Best Production: Mezzanine

Best Nightlife Photographer: Misha Vladimirskiy/Butchershop Creative

Best Flyer Design: Stanley Frank

Best Promoter: Juanita More

Best Weekly Party: Honey Soundsystem

Best Monthly Party: Hard French

CMAC is a non-profit trade association of venue owners and operators, industry professionals, artists, and fans dedicated to the preservation and enrichment of music and culture in the State of California. www.CMACsf.org. Since its launch in 2010, CMAC has forged relationships with local law enforcement and City Hall. It has influenced policy - including the alcohol fee, anti-rave initiative, parking lot security legislation, preservation of large music events in Golden Gate Park, Economic Impact Study of entertainment in San Francisco - conducted numerous education workshops, and represented the industry in a way that did not exist before the organization’s formation.

 

Media contact:
Laura Hahn, Executive Director
(415) 863-1565 – office
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

###

 
CMAC Awarded Small Business Advocate Award!
Wednesday, 16 May 2012 14:17

As part of its 2012 Small Business Awards, the San Francisco Bay Guardian has presented CMAC the Small Business Advocate award!

We are thrilled to be recognized along with small businesses and local merchants that are keeping neighborhoods lively and creating quality local jobs.

Read about all the San Francisco Bay Guardian awards here.

guardian article

 
CMAC Nightlife Awards!
Tuesday, 24 April 2012 12:28

On May 31 help CMAC celebrate our two year anniversary and the people and places that have made San Francisco nightlife excellent!

Get your tickets today!

poster

 
San Francisco Chronicle Editorial: That's the price of entertainment
Tuesday, 20 March 2012 10:45

That's the price of entertainment

Re-posted from the San Francisco Chronicle, Monday, March 19, 2012

Original San Francisco Chronicle Editorial Post: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/03/18/EDLN1MNU9V.DTL#ixzz1pgUNCaqN

At last we can quantify the economic value of all the nighttime carousing in San Francisco's bars and clubs. A report by the city controller's office says the after-dark entertainment scene generates $4.2 billion a year in spending, $1 billion of it from nightclubs, taverns, performances and art spaces. The tax haul: $55 million.

That's a hefty chunk of revenue, but it can come at a price: noise, crime and annoyed neighbors. City politicians, police and neighbors share the responsibility of keeping the revelry under control while encouraging it to prosper.

An example of the downside is Polk Street, where residents and some merchants are complaining of noisy crowds walking the streets late at night - one two-block stretch is home to nine bars. Similar complaints are heard in other neighborhoods.

The most extreme case of out-of-control nightlife in recent years was a rash of shootings at a few clubs in 2010. The result was legislation to beef up the power of the Entertainment Commission to shut down problem businesses, and most observers say that has tamped down the problem.

Ron Case, chairman of the Lower Polk Neighbors group, would like to see a moratorium on new liquor licenses in his area. He also suggests that merchants could fund an improvement district for the neighborhood, like the one that hires "ambassadors" to patrol Union Square and give the cops a heads-up about problems. (He also would like to see all businesses shut down by 2 a.m. - good luck with that.)

This is San Francisco, not the suburbs. Part of the experience of living in a big city is the wide range of entertainment available to residents. That also attracts young people seeking fun and employment and out-of-towners with cash to spend.

But nightlife does need some regulation to protect residents and merchants alike from bad behavior.

Supervisor Scott Wiener, who represents the Castro, ordered up the controller's study and says its findings give officials real facts on which to base decisions: "In the past, those decisions frequently have been driven by anecdote or overreaction to isolated events."

A good first step: Wiener is looking at ways to give the Entertainment Commission more authority to shut down problem establishments.

Local efforts by activists like Ron Case play an important role in tracking this ever-evolving problem. But the controller's study shows how important this industry is and should prompt City Hall to keep it thriving and safe - for a number of reasons.

As Wiener says, "The $55 million this generates in taxes will pay for a lot of cops."

Nightlife: vibrant but safe

Here's what San Francisco needs to do:

Patrols: Establish more Business Improvement Districts to patrol neighborhoods with heavy nocturnal action. About a dozen of these already exist around the city, hiring "ambassadors" - you've seen them in Union Square, dressed in red coats and caps - to keep an eye on the action and alert police to any signs of trouble.

Dialogue: Neighborhood associations can help by pulling all parties together to talk about their concerns. They might even come up with some solutions.

Cops: Beef up the force on the street. Chief Greg Suhr says that with about 100 more officers (the department is down 250 from normal staffing), he could post a few cops near bars around closing time to urge patrons to head home instead of hanging around and keeping residents awake. Suhr has proposed a five-year plan.

Oversight: Given a little more legal muscle, the Entertainment Commission should be more aggressive in responding to the concerns of those who live in the city's entertainment districts.

This article appeared on page A - 11 of the San Francisco Chronicle


See the original article from the San Francisco Chronicle: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/03/18/EDLN1MNU9V.DTL#ixzz1pgUGbANl

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 4 of 12

Members

  • Get access to Members Only events and perks
  • Support California's vibrant music and culture


Become a Fan

Fan of the industry? CMAC supports California's music and culture, and your donations will help fund educational workshops, programs, and more.

Learn more about CMAC



Connect with CMAC

LEGISLATION


To read proposed new legislation that will affect our industry and get quick access to the laws that affect your business.

CMAC on Facebook

Copyright © 2013 California Music and Culture Association. All Rights Reserved.
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.